Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ABALAMABIE

IMO: 9690171
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bonny Gas Transport Ltd

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

240

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.04

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (−16%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,711 t

CO₂ emitted

26,770 t

Distance sailed

40,528 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,430 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 173 kg/nm · median 190 (−9%)

152Ranks 113 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 14.4 (−30%)

11.2Faster than 6% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.9 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+67%)

5.06Ranks 325 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

865 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG ABALAMABIE
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ABALAMABIE
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ABALAMABIE
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	−7%	−21%	+45%	+63%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	−27%	−33%	+232%	+79%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+40%	+44%	−85%	−43%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	−20%	−34%	+40%	−8%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.4 kn	−6%	+21%	+7%	−14%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−46%	−37%	+37%	−73%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 46%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	+112%	+52%	−13%	+310%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 112%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	7,449	19,947	43,120	4,280	10.1	173	–	–
2024LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	5,537	14,822	29,699	2,520	11.8	186	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,269	6,256	8,943	696	12.9	254	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,952	30,952	60,583	4,854	12.5	181	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9,786	26,979	43,251	2,854	15.2	226	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9,711	26,770	40,528	3,430	11.8	240	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13,132	36,209	29,562	2,945	10.0	444	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	7,128	19,642	34,076	2,438	14.0	209	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	11.9	7.12	+67%	325 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	7.33	7.39	−1%	155 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4.10	9.10	−55%	9 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.14	10.4	−31%	92 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7.78	10.5	−26%	86 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.04	10.7	−16%	81 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	33.6	10.9	+209%	235 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	8.19	10.9	−25%	41 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.