Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

JIN RUI

IMO: 9691436
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HANTON TRADER III

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Goldbeam International Ltd.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,506 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

709

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (+680%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

65.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+655%)

Average speed

8.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

143.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

360 t

CO₂ emitted

1,153 t

Distance sailed

508 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

60 h

3 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 3,968 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 709 kg/nm · median 90.8 (+680%)

66.4Ranks 3,968 of 3,968, lowest first134

Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 11.1 (−24%)

9.2Faster than 6% of bulk carrier ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 65.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.71 (+655%)

5.10Ranks 3,952 of 3,968, lowest first17.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU0%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU83%

Fuel burned laden

60 t

17% of all fuel; 83% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

961 t

83.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JIN RUI
Bulk carrier median

0.0200.0400.0600.0800.0

’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

JIN RUI
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Goldbeam International Ltd.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	360	1,153	508	60	8.4	709	65.8	17%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Goldbeam International Ltd.	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	65.8	8.71	+655%	3,952 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.