Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG LAGOS II

IMO: 9692014
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NLNG Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

237

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

0.63

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−94%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

71.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,757 t

CO₂ emitted

32,559 t

Distance sailed

49,716 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,922 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 218 kg/nm · median 190 (+14%)

152Ranks 264 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 14.4 (−3%)

11.2Faster than 40% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.2 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+43%)

5.06Ranks 300 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,151 t

12.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG LAGOS II
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG LAGOS II
LNG carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG LAGOS II
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	−4%	+11%	−36%	+6%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+3%	+18%	−23%	−0%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.4 kn	+16%	−5%	+47%	+55%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−7%	−15%	+27%	−34%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−14%	−7%	−4%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	+0.4 kn	+1%	+4%	−31%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	6,683	17,869	30,664	2,185	14.0	218	–	26%
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	10,820	28,933	47,879	3,917	12.2	226	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	13,616	37,580	61,960	5,791	10.7	220	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7,969	21,974	42,122	3,217	13.1	189	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6,745	18,618	33,061	2,318	14.3	204	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8,201	22,629	34,503	2,634	13.1	238	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	11,757	32,559	49,716	3,922	12.7	237	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	10.2	7.12	+43%	300 of 386	Lloyd's Register	C
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	9.61	7.39	+30%	212 of 312	Lloyd's Register	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9.65	9.10	+6%	191 of 355	Lloyd's Register	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.21	10.4	−40%	50 of 379	Lloyd's Register	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.37	10.5	−10%	125 of 289	Lloyd's Register	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	0.63	10.9	−94%	2 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.