Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

IVS ISOGO

IMO
9692715
Type
Bulk carrier
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
IVS NARUO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Tamar Ship Management Pte Ltd

?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.1 kg/nm · median 86.1 (−15%)
63.6Ranks 869 of 3,548, lowest first124.7
Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 10.8 (+6%)
8.8Faster than 73% of bulk carrier ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.56 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (−33%)
4.85Ranks 582 of 3,548, lowest first17.36
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • IVS ISOGO
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • IVS ISOGO
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • IVS ISOGO
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2025–––––
2022→2023−0.2 kn−29%−30%+258%−15%Same speed, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.2 kn+12%+1%−76%+6%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.1 kn+18%+29%+422%−30%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+0.3 kn−6%−4%−49%−7%Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.1 kn+6%−4%−63%+46%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Tamar Ship Management Pte Ltd00–0––––
2023not published8922,82512,2001,07011.473.15.56–
2022not published3501,1153,40929311.6102.86.55–
2021not published1,3154,15114,2761,11212.892.16.18–
2020not published2146742,73323311.778.38.88–
2019not published4471,3935,34747011.483.79.53–
2018not published1,1563,62414,6331,16812.579.06.54–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Tamar Ship Management Pte Ltd––––VerifaviaB
2023not published5.568.27−33%582 of 3,548ClassNKA
2022not published6.558.71−25%948 of 3,968ClassNKA
2021not published6.188.57−28%659 of 3,466ClassNKA
2020not published8.888.24+8%1,824 of 3,150ClassNKA
2019not published9.538.38+14%2,110 of 3,360ClassNKA
2018not published6.548.50−23%849 of 3,384ClassNKA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

IVS ISOGO (IMO 9692715): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze