Navalyze · Container · Ship

MARIANNE SCHULTE

IMO: 9694438
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,630 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.01 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAJESTIC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SUNGEI PARK SHIPPING CO PTE. LTD.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,970 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

117

Container median 174 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

40.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+115%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,059 t

CO₂ emitted

31,462 t

Distance sailed

86,246 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,861 h

244 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 123 kg/nm · median 177 (−30%)

78.8Ranks 729 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.3 (−3%)

9.1Faster than 43% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+103%)

7.22Ranks 1,747 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU37%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

412 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARIANNE SCHULTE
Container median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARIANNE SCHULTE
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARIANNE SCHULTE
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.0 kn	+9%	−12%	−45%	−2%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+11%	+15%	+0%	−3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	+23%	+25%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−4%	−2%	−14%	+14%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	+4%	+14%	−39%	+3%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−14%	−22%	−51%	−41%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SUNGEI PARK SHIPPING CO PTE. LTD.	1,830	5,732	14,872	1,149	12.9	123	33.1	–
2024	SUNGEI PARK SHIPPING CO PTE. LTD.	3,069	9,651	27,136	1,702	15.9	113	33.9	–
2023	not published	2,769	8,723	27,136	1,773	15.3	102	35.1	–
2022	not published	2,203	6,931	21,993	1,464	15.0	100	28.0	–
2021	not published	2,676	8,380	25,538	1,748	14.6	105	24.6	–
2020	not published	4,222	13,262	41,890	3,156	13.3	101	23.9	–
2019	not published	10,059	31,462	86,246	5,861	14.7	117	40.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SUNGEI PARK SHIPPING CO PTE. LTD.	33.1	16.3	+103%	1,747 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	SUNGEI PARK SHIPPING CO PTE. LTD.	33.9	17.5	+93%	1,532 of 1,974	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	35.1	19.4	+81%	1,453 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	28.0	19.1	+47%	1,245 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	24.6	17.9	+37%	1,170 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	23.9	17.6	+36%	1,186 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	40.7	18.9	+115%	1,429 of 1,788	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.