Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK BERMUDA

IMO: 9697014
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 1,356 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 12.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORDISABELLA

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,356 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

85.2 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

196

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

14.6 kn

Fuel per day at sea

29.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

868 t

CO₂ emitted

2,716 t

Distance sailed

10,197 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

696 h

29 days, 8% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2018

Set against all 1,705 container ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 155.3 kg/nm · median 181.8 (−15%)

82.0Ranks 737 of 1,705, lowest first312.9

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.8 (+15%)

8.7Faster than 77% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 20.22 (+31%)

8.65Ranks 1,086 of 1,705, lowest first54.44

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU37%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAERSK BERMUDA
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’212021

Average speed, kn

MAERSK BERMUDA
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’212021

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2021	−1.3 kn	−45%	−49%	−86%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 45%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2021	not published	868	2,716	10,197	696	14.6	85.2	196.44	–
2018	not published	10,971	34,301	70,645	4,447	15.9	155.3	26.44	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2018	not published	26.44	20.22	+31%	1,086 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.