Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CRYSTAL BAY

IMO
9697624
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
28,217 t
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.32 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,217 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
82.1 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 129.1 kg/nm (−36%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
9.16
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+9%)
Average speed
11.0 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+0%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,158 t
CO₂ emitted
3,645 t
Distance sailed
14,104 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,283 h
53 days, 15% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.1 kg/nm · median 129.1 (−36%)
80.4Ranks 210 of 1,797, lowest first192.7
Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 11.0 (+0%)
8.1Faster than 49% of oil tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.16 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (+9%)
4.78Ranks 1,015 of 1,797, lowest first25.50
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports15%
  • From the EU33%
  • Into the EU44%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
8.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CRYSTAL BAY
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • CRYSTAL BAY
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CRYSTAL BAY
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2023−0.1 kn−2%−3%−39%−7%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022+0.3 kn+14%+17%+65%+10%Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−1.1 kn+1%−8%−67%+8%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.6 kn−5%+0%+214%+17%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.4 kn−5%−8%−16%−40%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published1,1583,64514,1041,28311.082.19.16–
2022not published1,9296,06423,1162,07411.183.59.84–
2021not published1,0263,21213,9891,29710.873.38.93–
2020not published3,1009,71442,6493,58811.972.78.30–
2019not published1,0403,25013,6011,20711.376.57.12–
2018not published1,3024,07516,1331,38311.780.711.96–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published9.168.44+9%1,015 of 1,797DNVB
2022not published9.848.51+16%1,175 of 1,961DNVB
2021not published8.938.86+1%909 of 1,789DNVB
2020not published8.309.03−8%823 of 1,870DNVB
2019not published7.128.83−19%637 of 1,919DNVB
2018not published11.968.86+35%1,229 of 1,779DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CRYSTAL BAY (IMO 9697624): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2023 | Navalyze