Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CERES ONE

IMO: 9698434
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 25,246 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: Georgetown
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LILY OLDENDORFF

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Project Ceres One Limited

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,097 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.0

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.70

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+5%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,960 t

CO₂ emitted

6,180 t

Distance sailed

27,222 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,532 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 75.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−9%)

61.0Ranks 1,217 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 35% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.38 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+19%)

4.80Ranks 2,405 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU38%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

1,482 t

76% of all fuel; 24% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

758 t

12.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CERES ONE
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CERES ONE
Bulk carrier median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CERES ONE
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−4%	−7%	+27%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+8%	+7%	−42%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−13%	−13%	+513%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+2%	+15%	−67%	−15%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.7 kn	+11%	−6%	−38%	−9%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−1%	+14%	+73%	+58%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	+12%	−66%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Project Ceres One Limited	1,509	4,764	20,116	1,963	10.2	75.0	9.38	–
2024	Project Ceres One Limited	1,234	3,866	15,790	1,487	10.6	78.1	9.64	89%
2023	not published	1,960	6,180	27,222	2,532	10.8	72.0	8.70	76%
2022	not published	368	1,152	4,441	411	10.8	82.8	8.37	–
2021	not published	1,088	3,408	13,472	1,399	9.6	80.8	9.86	–
2020	not published	1,592	5,019	21,790	1,933	11.3	73.0	10.9	–
2019	not published	925	2,892	12,613	1,288	9.8	73.4	6.87	–
2018	not published	813	2,555	11,228	1,129	9.9	72.4	20.3	92%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Project Ceres One Limited	9.38	7.90	+19%	2,405 of 3,611	ABS	A
2024	Project Ceres One Limited	9.64	8.09	+19%	2,039 of 3,089	ABS	A
2023	not published	8.70	8.27	+5%	1,951 of 3,548	ABS	–
2022	not published	8.37	8.71	−4%	1,821 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	9.86	8.57	+15%	2,201 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	10.9	8.24	+32%	2,347 of 3,150	ABS	A
2019	not published	6.87	8.38	−18%	1,052 of 3,360	ABS	A
2018	not published	20.3	8.50	+139%	3,201 of 3,384	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.