Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

DESERT RANGER

IMO: 9699854
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 37,844 t
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 37,844 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

95.7 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.94

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+1%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,881 t

CO₂ emitted

5,910 t

6,002 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,667 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,065 h

86 days, 24% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 95.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+16%)

61.0Ranks 2,704 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 10.7 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 18% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.94 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+1%)

4.80Ranks 1,819 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU43%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,092 t).

Fuel burned laden

78%

22% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

DESERT RANGER
Bulk carrier median

75.080.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DESERT RANGER
Bulk carrier median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DESERT RANGER
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+17%	−2%	+79%	+34%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−11%	−7%	−8%	+5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−0.5 kn	+4%	−1%	−1%	−19%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+14%	+17%	−28%	−26%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−16%	−9%	+4%	−7%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+15%	+13%	+3%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management Ltd	1,881	5,910	19,667	2,065	9.5	95.7	7.94	78%
2024	Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management Ltd	899	2,827	10,986	964	11.4	81.8	5.93	88%
2023	not published	1,101	3,483	11,922	1,096	10.9	92.3	5.65	77%
2021	not published	1,064	3,341	12,024	1,052	11.4	88.5	6.95	77%
2020	not published	1,298	4,102	16,672	1,504	11.1	77.8	9.38	–
2019	not published	1,484	4,639	16,065	1,560	10.3	92.3	10.11	–
2018	not published	1,251	3,900	15,640	1,490	10.5	80.0	8.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management Ltd	7.94	7.89	+1%	1,819 of 3,610	ABS	B+C
2024	Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management Ltd	5.93	8.09	−27%	667 of 3,089	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	5.65	8.27	−32%	617 of 3,548	ABS	C
2021	not published	6.95	8.57	−19%	967 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.38	8.24	+14%	1,991 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.11	8.38	+21%	2,275 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	8.52	8.50	+0%	1,699 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.