Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CL CONTIGO

IMO: 9703411
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 31,108 t
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Antwerp
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.56 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SIDER FAIOCH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CONTI-LINES NV

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,340 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.1

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.61

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+0%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,530 t

CO₂ emitted

7,989 t

Distance sailed

36,615 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,279 h

137 days, 37% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−12%)

61.0Ranks 1,069 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 39% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.33 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−7%)

4.80Ranks 1,546 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU40%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

1,839 t

73% of all fuel; 27% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

327 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CL CONTIGO
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CL CONTIGO
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CL CONTIGO
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−2%	−8%	+4%	−16%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	+0%	−10%	+32%	−10%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−0%	+4%	−61%	+21%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+8%	+14%	−5%	−7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+5%	+16%	−12%	−22%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+2%	+29%	−12%	−4%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−23%	−20%	+184%	+9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CONTI-LINES NV	1,360	4,261	18,685	1,802	10.4	72.8	7.33	95%
2024	CONTI-LINES NV	1,335	4,195	17,967	1,628	11.0	74.3	8.69	85%
2023	not published	1,010	3,168	13,623	1,113	12.2	74.2	9.69	91%
2022	not published	2,590	8,193	34,796	2,955	11.8	74.5	8.02	88%
2021	not published	2,530	7,989	36,615	3,279	11.2	69.1	8.61	73%
2020	not published	2,762	8,739	41,842	4,173	10.0	66.0	11.0	–
2019	not published	3,050	9,526	47,302	5,942	8.0	64.5	11.5	–
2018	not published	1,401	4,371	16,683	2,192	7.6	84.0	10.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CONTI-LINES NV	7.33	7.90	−7%	1,546 of 3,611	ABS	B+C
2024	CONTI-LINES NV	8.69	8.09	+7%	1,761 of 3,089	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	9.69	8.27	+17%	2,260 of 3,548	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.02	8.71	−8%	1,643 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.61	8.57	+0%	1,750 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.0	8.24	+34%	2,403 of 3,150	RINA	B
2019	not published	11.5	8.38	+37%	2,594 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	10.6	8.50	+25%	2,406 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.