Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MACOMA

IMO: 9705653
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

298.9 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 296.8 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.66

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.71 (−10%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,827 t

CO₂ emitted

16,277 t

Distance sailed

19,492 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,320 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 267 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 298.9 kg/nm · median 296.8 (+1%)

201.8Ranks 139 of 267, lowest first396.9

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.7 (+1%)

11.8Faster than 51% of LNG carrier ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.66 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.71 (−10%)

6.68Ranks 106 of 267, lowest first18.58

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU63%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

57%

43% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MACOMA
LNG carrier median

225.0250.0275.0300.0325.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

MACOMA
LNG carrier median

13.514.014.515.015.5

’182018’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MACOMA
LNG carrier median

8.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+32%	+35%	+55%	+13%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−2%	−8%	−26%	−15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020LNG	not published	5,827	16,277	19,492	1,320	14.8	298.9	–	57%
2019LNG	not published	2,837	7,904	12,571	866	14.5	225.7	–	55%
2018LNG	not published	3,906	10,899	17,027	1,096	15.5	229.4	–	48%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020LNG	not published	9.66	10.71	−10%	106 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019LNG	not published	8.57	10.87	−21%	61 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018LNG	not published	10.10	10.92	−8%	72 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.