Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE MILLAU

IMO: 9706736
Type: Container ship
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.58 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MILLAU BRIDGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. · part of Shoei

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

221.2 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

62.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,138 t

CO₂ emitted

9,783 t

9,937 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,184 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,210 h

50 days, 14% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 258.2 kg/nm · median 165.1 (+56%)

77.6Ranks 1,550 of 1,899, lowest first290.9

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.2 (+8%)

10.0Faster than 70% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.96 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.40 (−64%)

7.34Ranks 152 of 1,899, lowest first51.88

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU85%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU0%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,324 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ONE MILLAU
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ONE MILLAU
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE MILLAU
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−2.5 kn	−14%	−29%	−46%	–	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.1 kn	+1%	+29%	+75%	−30%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.0 kn	+0%	−26%	−33%	+29%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+6%	+12%	−45%	+11%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−9%	−15%	+5%	−20%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−2%	−7%	−34%	+2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	3,138	9,783	14,184	1,210	11.7	221.2	–	–
2023	not published	6,758	21,373	26,170	1,848	14.2	258.2	6.96	–
2022	not published	3,820	12,060	14,994	1,349	11.1	254.8	9.91	–
2021	not published	5,735	18,100	22,503	1,493	15.1	254.8	7.70	–
2020	not published	9,868	31,118	41,214	2,883	14.3	239.4	6.94	–
2019	not published	10,342	32,286	39,231	2,580	15.2	263.6	8.64	–
2018	not published	16,093	50,171	59,531	3,725	16.0	270.3	8.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	6.96	19.40	−64%	152 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	9.91	19.13	−48%	314 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	7.70	17.90	−57%	173 of 1,781	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	6.94	17.58	−61%	164 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	8.64	18.88	−54%	240 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	8.46	20.22	−58%	169 of 1,705	ClassNK	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.