Navalyze · Container · Ship

YM WIND

IMO: 9708461
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 71,115 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.77 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 100,258 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

243

Container median 182 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.55

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−63%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

92.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,533 t

CO₂ emitted

57,815 t

Distance sailed

76,379 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,793 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 240 kg/nm · median 177 (+35%)

78.8Ranks 1,561 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 13.3 (−32%)

9.1Faster than 10% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−35%)

7.22Ranks 643 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU30%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

902 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YM WIND
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’202020’252025

Average speed, kn

YM WIND
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YM WIND
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2025	−5.0 kn	−0%	−36%	−92%	+59%	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	+0%	−12%	+1%	−16%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−1%	+0%	−64%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	544	1,705	2,269	250	9.1	240	10.6	–
2020	not published	6,735	21,031	28,031	1,990	14.1	240	6.65	–
2019	not published	6,657	20,775	27,770	1,721	16.1	240	7.87	–
2018	not published	18,533	57,815	76,379	4,793	15.9	243	7.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	10.6	16.3	−35%	643 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	6.65	17.6	−62%	140 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	7.87	18.9	−58%	182 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	7.55	20.2	−63%	104 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.