Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

FLORENTIA

IMO: 9714666
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 49,150 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.95 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Blue Seas Shipping S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 49,150 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

103.5 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.66

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−16%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,147 t

CO₂ emitted

9,957 t

10,111 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,417 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,178 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 103.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+25%)

61.0Ranks 3,032 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.7 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 19% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.66 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−16%)

4.80Ranks 1,195 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU48%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU7%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,708 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FLORENTIA
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FLORENTIA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FLORENTIA
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+15%	+14%	+39%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−18%	−21%	+444%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.0 kn	+7%	+34%	−68%	–	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+1%	+19%	+77%	−33%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	+58%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.4 kn	+10%	−26%	−44%	−81%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	+10%	−2%	+136%	+152%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Blue Seas Shipping S.A.	3,147	9,957	30,417	3,178	9.6	103.5	6.66	–
2024	Blue Seas Shipping S.A.	1,965	6,225	21,888	2,253	9.7	89.8	6.40	–
2023	not published	442	1,402	4,021	398	10.1	109.8	171.65	–
2022	not published	1,275	4,039	12,398	1,536	8.1	102.8	6.31	–
2021	not published	711	2,245	6,996	1,019	6.9	101.6	9.35	100%
2020	not published	486	1,532	4,440	648	6.8	109.3	7.76	–
2019	not published	782	2,452	7,889	772	10.2	99.1	41.03	–
2018	not published	301	938	3,346	292	11.5	89.9	16.28	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Blue Seas Shipping S.A.	6.66	7.89	−16%	1,195 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2024	Blue Seas Shipping S.A.	6.40	8.09	−21%	849 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	6.31	8.71	−28%	841 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	9.35	8.57	+9%	2,045 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	7.76	8.24	−6%	1,367 of 3,150	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	41.03	8.38	+390%	3,333 of 3,360	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	16.28	8.50	+92%	3,059 of 3,384	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.