Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CL ZHAOGE

IMO
9718090
Type
Oil tanker
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
MAERSK TIMARU
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
66.1 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
11.8 kn
Fuel per day at sea
18.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
785 t
CO₂ emitted
2,469 t
Distance sailed
11,878 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,004 h
42 days, 11% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,961 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 86.8 kg/nm · median 131.1 (−34%)
79.6Ranks 277 of 1,961, lowest first192.4
Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 10.9 (−19%)
7.9Faster than 17% of oil tanker ships12.3
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.51 (+2%)
4.85Ranks 1,012 of 1,961, lowest first24.95
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports4%
  • From the EU43%
  • Into the EU49%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
93%
7% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
4.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CL ZHAOGE
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • CL ZHAOGE
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CL ZHAOGE
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2023+3.0 kn−24%+2%+344%–3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−3.1 kn−4%−29%−8%−30%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021+2.3 kn+2%+26%−71%+63%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published7852,46911,8781,00411.866.1–93%
2022not published2327282,6783038.886.88.7089%
2021not published2638262,89924411.990.612.50–
2018not published8882,78310,0071,0429.688.77.68–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published––––ABS–
2022not published8.708.51+2%1,012 of 1,961ABSB
2021not published12.508.86+41%1,252 of 1,789ABSB+C
2018not published7.688.86−13%688 of 1,779ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CL ZHAOGE (IMO 9718090): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2023 | Navalyze