Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT LIND

IMO
9719264
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
23,567 t
Port of registry
Madeira
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,567 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
79.2 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−1%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.44
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−31%)
Average speed
12.1 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+9%)
Fuel per day at sea
23.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,080 t
CO₂ emitted
12,678 t
12,878 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
51,527 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,259 h
177 days, 49% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 79.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−1%)
52.8Ranks 707 of 1,460, lowest first111.0
Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)
8.8Faster than 83% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−31%)
7.93Ranks 374 of 1,460, lowest first40.17
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports5%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU50%
  • At berth in the EU6%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,401 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
6.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • STOLT LIND
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • STOLT LIND
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • STOLT LIND
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2025−0.3 kn−8%−11%+291%−20%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+1.3 kn+30%+45%+11%−24%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2022−1.1 kn−20%−27%−77%+41%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.5 kn+1%+5%+84%−44%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Stolt Tankers BV4,08012,67851,5274,25912.179.210.44–
2023not published1,1393,56513,1861,06212.486.313.11–
2022not published7882,47711,8641,07211.166.517.33–
2019not published4,26113,37251,4854,23012.282.812.25–
2018not published2,2897,17727,9492,38011.781.921.78–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Stolt Tankers BV10.4415.04−31%374 of 1,460DNVB
2023not published13.1116.23−19%448 of 1,314DNVB
2022not published17.3316.06+8%769 of 1,409DNVB
2019not published12.2517.32−29%328 of 1,321Lloyd's RegisterB
2018not published21.7817.14+27%870 of 1,294Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

STOLT LIND (IMO 9719264): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze