Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT EXCELLENCE

IMO
9720081
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
18,633 t
Port of registry
George Town
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.19 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,633 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
148.4 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (+81%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
24.98
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.23 (+54%)
Average speed
12.3 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (+10%)
Fuel per day at sea
43.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,601 t
CO₂ emitted
5,019 t
Distance sailed
10,784 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
876 h
37 days, 10% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 148.4 kg/nm · median 81.9 (+81%)
55.0Ranks 1,288 of 1,314, lowest first114.9
Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 11.2 (+10%)
9.1Faster than 83% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.23 (+54%)
9.07Ranks 936 of 1,314, lowest first43.80
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports16%
  • From the EU21%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU22%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
22.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • STOLT EXCELLENCE
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • STOLT EXCELLENCE
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • STOLT EXCELLENCE
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2023+0.6 kn+18%+24%−68%+63%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.4 kn+4%+0%+38%+29%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.4 kn−1%−4%−44%−34%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019+0.3 kn−3%−0%+77%+23%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published1,6015,01910,78487612.3148.424.98–
2021not published4,23113,19233,5582,87811.7126.115.31–
2020not published2,9279,11524,2341,99512.1120.811.87–
2019not published5,32116,59143,4033,47612.5122.617.86–
2018not published3,0929,63524,5862,01912.2125.814.55–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published24.9816.23+54%936 of 1,314DNVB
2021not published15.3116.69−8%583 of 1,343DNVB
2020not published11.8716.16−27%321 of 1,312Lloyd's RegisterB
2019not published17.8617.32+3%691 of 1,321Lloyd's RegisterB
2018not published14.5517.14−15%480 of 1,294Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.