Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

BBG MASTER

IMO: 9721982
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 47,484 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SBI PISCES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NINGBO HUAYANG MARITIME SERVICE Co Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 47,484 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

92.1 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.08

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−23%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,753 t

CO₂ emitted

5,494 t

5,580 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,030 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,948 h

81 days, 22% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 92.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+12%)

61.0Ranks 2,502 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 10.7 (−8%)

8.8Faster than 22% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−23%)

4.80Ranks 913 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU25%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU5%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,062 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BBG MASTER
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BBG MASTER
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BBG MASTER
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+3%	−4%	+30%	−5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	−15%	−27%	+62%	−32%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+19%	+25%	+107%	+7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+1.2 kn	+2%	+14%	−84%	+35%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	+16%	+29%	+451%	+24%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	−0%	−20%	−26%	−8%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NINGBO HUAYANG MARITIME SERVICE Co Ltd	1,753	5,494	19,030	1,948	9.8	92.1	6.08	–
2024	NINGBO HUAYANG MARITIME SERVICE Co Ltd	1,312	4,109	14,646	1,401	10.5	89.6	6.38	–
2023	not published	950	2,998	9,063	742	12.2	104.8	9.41	–
2022	not published	387	1,225	4,372	377	11.6	88.4	8.79	–
2020	not published	2,318	7,254	26,641	2,569	10.4	87.0	6.51	–
2019	not published	361	1,126	4,835	519	9.3	74.7	5.23	–
2018	not published	488	1,535	6,517	557	11.7	74.9	5.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NINGBO HUAYANG MARITIME SERVICE Co Ltd	6.08	7.89	−23%	913 of 3,610	China Classification Society	A
2024	NINGBO HUAYANG MARITIME SERVICE Co Ltd	6.38	8.09	−21%	840 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A+B+C
2023	not published	9.41	8.27	+14%	2,182 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	8.79	8.71	+1%	2,020 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.51	8.24	−21%	825 of 3,150	DNV	B
2019	not published	5.23	8.38	−38%	413 of 3,360	DNV	B
2018	not published	5.66	8.50	−33%	548 of 3,384	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.