Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ANTARES

IMO: 9723019
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,632 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.85 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,632 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

74.2 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−24%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,631 t

CO₂ emitted

8,354 t

8,483 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,454 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,389 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−7%)

52.8Ranks 594 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 33% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−24%)

7.93Ranks 453 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU18%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU11%

67% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,598 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ANTARES
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANTARES
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANTARES
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+3.4 kn	−34%	−3%	+222%	−55%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.8 kn	+16%	−17%	−70%	+12%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+4%	+3%	+16%	+83%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+17%	+5%	−6%	+2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	−14%	+4%	+27%	−61%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	+23%	+1%	−36%	+120%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−11%	+2%	+71%	−21%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	2,631	8,354	35,454	3,389	10.5	74.2	11.42	–
2024	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	1,238	3,900	11,014	1,544	7.1	112.4	25.45	–
2023	not published	3,538	11,194	36,355	3,677	9.9	97.3	22.72	–
2022	not published	2,914	9,124	31,243	3,104	10.1	93.3	12.44	–
2021	not published	2,658	8,376	33,364	2,985	11.2	79.7	12.16	–
2020	not published	2,436	7,666	26,188	2,836	9.2	93.0	30.87	–
2019	not published	3,091	9,642	40,873	3,647	11.2	75.6	14.06	–
2018	not published	2,025	6,324	23,843	2,441	9.8	84.9	17.81	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	11.42	15.04	−24%	453 of 1,460	RINA	A
2024	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	25.45	16.73	+52%	906 of 1,274	RINA	A
2023	not published	22.72	16.23	+40%	872 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	12.44	16.06	−23%	437 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	12.16	16.69	−27%	351 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	30.87	16.16	+91%	1,063 of 1,312	RINA	A
2019	not published	14.06	17.32	−19%	445 of 1,321	RINA	A
2018	not published	17.81	17.14	+4%	681 of 1,294	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.