Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SHENGHUI GLORY

IMO
9724037
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
4,559 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
GION TRADER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,298 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
69.6
Chemical tanker median 84.6 kg/nm (−18%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
23.6
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.1 (+47%)
Average speed
9.2 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−17%)
Fuel per day at sea
15.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,139 t
CO₂ emitted
3,596 t
Distance sailed
16,369 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,773 h
74 days, 20% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 49.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−38%)
52.8Ranks 104 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 11.1 (+8%)
8.8Faster than 79% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+127%)
7.93Ranks 1,226 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports29%
  • From the EU18%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU13%
Fuel burned laden
517 t
45% of all fuel; 55% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
460 t
12.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SHENGHUI GLORY
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SHENGHUI GLORY
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SHENGHUI GLORY
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn−17%−21%−46%+38%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+1.0 kn−14%−6%+219%+60%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+2.3 kn−0%+24%−38%−35%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−3.2 kn−28%−47%+24%−62%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.3 kn+48%+51%+19%+212%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.6 kn+2%−4%+92%+26%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.5 kn−10%−20%−56%−50%1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED8702,72417,5311,46412.049.634.1–
2024TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED1,9306,05832,2082,58012.559.924.7–
2023not published7012,20410,09688111.569.415.474%
2022not published1,1393,59616,3691,7739.269.623.645%
2021not published1,2854,08013,2251,06812.497.261.517%
2020not published7292,28811,07391712.165.819.767%
2019not published3721,1635,75745212.764.615.767%
2018not published9512,98413,21792914.271.931.174%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED34.115.0+127%1,226 of 1,460Bureau VeritasA
2024TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED24.716.7+48%891 of 1,274Bureau VeritasA
2023not published15.416.2−5%614 of 1,314Bureau VeritasC
2022not published23.616.1+47%1,017 of 1,409Bureau VeritasC
2021not published61.516.7+268%1,305 of 1,343Bureau VeritasC
2020not published19.716.2+22%844 of 1,312Bureau VeritasC
2019not published15.717.3−9%557 of 1,321Bureau VeritasC
2018not published31.117.1+81%1,034 of 1,294Bureau VeritasC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.