Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SWAN INDIAN

IMO: 9724051
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 12,257 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HORIN TRADER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,523 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

77.7

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

37.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+118%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+32%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

453 t

CO₂ emitted

1,425 t

Distance sailed

5,840 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

438 h

18 days, 5% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 62.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−21%)

52.8Ranks 329 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 11.1 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 54% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+8%)

7.93Ranks 797 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU0%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

417 t

92% of all fuel; 8% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

116 t

8.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SWAN INDIAN
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SWAN INDIAN
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SWAN INDIAN
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+5.7 kn	−13%	+76%	+282%	−8%	5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−4.6 kn	+7%	−41%	−52%	−66%	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−31%	−42%	+88%	+123%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+30%	+22%	+154%	+9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−3%	+2%	−56%	+30%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−26%	−10%	−16%	−43%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.2 kn	+35%	+2%	+132%	−24%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,764	8,725	44,021	3,921	11.2	62.8	16.2	76%
2024part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	835	2,629	11,533	2,079	5.5	72.4	17.5	72%
2024	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	835	2,629	11,533	2,079	5.5	72.4	17.5	72%
2023	not published	1,604	5,037	23,807	2,354	10.1	67.4	51.0	34%
2022	not published	1,231	3,890	12,655	1,039	12.2	97.2	22.9	54%
2021	not published	371	1,166	4,974	382	13.0	74.7	21.0	52%
2020	not published	878	2,775	11,371	924	12.3	77.2	16.2	83%
2019	not published	1,423	4,476	13,574	1,346	10.1	105	28.4	68%
2018	not published	453	1,425	5,840	438	13.3	77.7	37.4	92%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	16.2	15.0	+8%	797 of 1,460	ABS	A
2024part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	17.5	16.7	+5%	683 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	51.0	16.2	+214%	1,236 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	22.9	16.1	+43%	998 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	21.0	16.7	+26%	886 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	16.2	16.2	+0%	656 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	28.4	17.3	+64%	1,017 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	37.4	17.1	+118%	1,105 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.