Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

VIKING SUN

IMO
9725433
Type
Passenger ship
Port of registry
Bergen
Technical efficiency
EIV 9.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
530.6 kg/nm
Passenger median 339.3 kg/nm (+56%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
108,843
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 1,169 (+9,214%)
Average speed
3.2 kn
Passenger median 11.0 kn (−71%)
Fuel per day at sea
40.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,152 t
CO₂ emitted
16,411 t
Distance sailed
9,710 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,030 h
126 days, 35% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2020

Set against all 100 passenger ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 530.6 kg/nm · median 339.3 (+56%)
116.9Ranks 78 of 100, lowest first807.9
Average speedThis ship 3.2 kn · median 11.0 (−71%)
5.2Faster than 3% of passenger ships16.8
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 108,842.82 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 1,168.55 (+9,214%)
333.98Ranks 93 of 100, lowest first74,156.58
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports42%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU15%
  • At berth in the EU42%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
42.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • VIKING SUN
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • VIKING SUN
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VIKING SUN
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020−6.8 kn+98%−37%−66%+11,323%6.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 98%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+2.6 kn+51%+105%−37%+55%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 51%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published5,15216,4119,7103,0303.2530.6––
2019not published7,55523,63728,1452,82110.0268.4––
2018not published7,88024,63044,4726,0437.4177.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published108,842.821,168.55+9,214%93 of 100DNVC
2019not published952.85589.20+62%127 of 177DNVC
2018not published614.45577.11+6%84 of 153DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

VIKING SUN (IMO 9725433): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2020 | Navalyze