Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

EPIC SUSAK

IMO
9726815
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
3,263 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 15.70 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,263 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
55.8 kg/nm
Gas carrier (LPG) median 83.3 kg/nm (−33%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
53.80
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 41.77 (+29%)
Average speed
11.9 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (−7%)
Fuel per day at sea
16.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,846 t
CO₂ emitted
5,811 t
Distance sailed
33,097 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,777 h
116 days, 32% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2023

Set against all 330 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 55.8 kg/nm · median 83.3 (−33%)
53.6Ranks 41 of 330, lowest first129.1
Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 12.8 (−7%)
10.1Faster than 32% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.80 g CO₂/t·nm · median 41.77 (+29%)
15.26Ranks 196 of 330, lowest first131.00
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports20%
  • From the EU34%
  • Into the EU37%
  • At berth in the EU9%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
9.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • EPIC SUSAK
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • EPIC SUSAK
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EPIC SUSAK
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2023−0.3 kn−31%−32%−7%−16%Same speed, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.1 kn+58%+59%+87%+84%Same speed, fuel per mile up 58%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published1,8465,81133,0972,77711.955.853.80–
2022not published2,8899,03935,7112,92012.280.964.11–
2021not published9773,05919,0531,57512.151.334.93–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2023not published53.8041.77+29%196 of 330Lloyd's RegisterA
2022not published64.1142.53+51%232 of 348VerifaviaA
2021not published34.9346.91−26%117 of 323VerifaviaA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

EPIC SUSAK (IMO 9726815): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2021–2023 | Navalyze