Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE

IMO: 9737187
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC3
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Gas Carriers SCF Mgmt FZCO

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

371.2 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (+82%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

12.04

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (+63%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

133.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,924 t

CO₂ emitted

45,179 t

60,222 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

45,598 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,052 h

127 days, 35% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 371.2 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+82%)

147.8Ranks 300 of 312, lowest first328.0

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.6 (+2%)

11.0Faster than 60% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 12.04 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+63%)

4.54Ranks 254 of 312, lowest first17.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (23,334 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

520.1 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.333

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+7%	−3%	+5%	+8%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+17%	+22%	−52%	−51%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−17%	−21%	+26%	−15%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−6%	−3%	+4%	−8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−11%	−5%	−6%	−8%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	+16%	+24%	−16%	+8%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Gas Carriers SCF Mgmt FZCO	16,924	45,179	45,598	3,052	14.9	371.2	–	–
2023LNG	not published	15,102	41,592	43,375	2,654	16.3	348.2	–	–
2022LNG	not published	27,078	74,567	90,677	5,788	15.7	298.6	–	–
2021LNG	not published	25,921	72,626	71,908	4,386	16.4	360.5	–	–
2020LNG	not published	26,739	73,674	69,451	4,380	15.9	385.0	–	–
2019LNG	not published	31,833	88,119	73,903	4,943	15.0	430.7	–	–
2018LNG	not published	32,671	90,315	87,892	6,267	14.0	371.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Gas Carriers SCF Mgmt FZCO	12.04	7.39	+63%	254 of 312	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2023LNG	not published	11.13	9.10	+22%	245 of 355	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2022LNG	not published	22.50	10.38	+117%	329 of 379	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2021LNG	not published	26.39	10.46	+152%	271 of 289	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2020LNG	not published	28.69	10.71	+168%	258 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG	not published	31.17	10.87	+187%	233 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018LNG	not published	28.83	10.92	+164%	188 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.