Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

GAIA DESGAGNES

IMO
9739800
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
6,928 t
Flag (estimated)
Canada
Port of registry
Quebec
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
FURE VINGA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Transport Desgagnes Inc

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,629 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
52.1
Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (−41%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
27.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (+56%)
Average speed
8.2 kn
Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−19%)
Fuel per day at sea
10.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
889 t
CO₂ emitted
2,602 t
Distance sailed
17,054 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,070 h
86 days, 24% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−20%)
52.8Ranks 346 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 11.1 (−22%)
8.8Faster than 10% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+91%)
7.93Ranks 1,155 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports39%
  • From the EU26%
  • Into the EU24%
  • At berth in the EU11%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
283 t
10.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GAIA DESGAGNES
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • GAIA DESGAGNES
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GAIA DESGAGNES
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.6 kn+0%−15%−14%+40%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.8 kn+32%+43%+52%+39%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+4.3 kn−29%+31%+8%−65%4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−4.9 kn+12%−43%−46%+72%4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+2.6 kn+7%+44%−16%+32%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.7 kn+8%−2%+14%−32%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+1.9 kn−18%+7%−38%+55%1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Transport Desgagnes Inc7842,45512,3361,4178.763.528.7–
2024Transport Desgagnes Inc9082,69214,3611,39310.363.220.6–
2023LNG / alt.not published4541,3249,4759979.547.914.7–
2022not published5881,8428,7531,6955.267.241.8–
2021LNG / alt.not published9742,82916,2631,61310.159.924.2–
2020LNG / alt.not published1,0893,17219,4012,5827.556.118.4–
2019LNG / alt.not published8892,60217,0542,0708.252.127.1–
2018not published1,7375,15027,3304,3466.363.517.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Transport Desgagnes Inc28.715.0+91%1,155 of 1,460DNVB+C
2024Transport Desgagnes Inc20.616.7+23%792 of 1,274DNVA+B
2023LNG / alt.not published14.716.2−9%579 of 1,314DNVA+B
2022not published41.816.1+160%1,284 of 1,409DNVA+B
2021LNG / alt.not published24.216.7+45%954 of 1,343DNVA+B
2020LNG / alt.not published18.416.2+14%786 of 1,312DNVA+B
2019LNG / alt.not published27.117.3+56%997 of 1,321DNVA+B
2018not published17.517.1+2%669 of 1,294Bureau VeritasC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.