Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

DSI POLLUX

IMO
9747405
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
41,523 t
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEDI 3.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
STH LONDON
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 41,523 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
76.3 kg/nm
Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−11%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
5.75
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (−30%)
Average speed
10.1 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
18.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
326 t
CO₂ emitted
1,020 t
Distance sailed
4,274 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
424 h
18 days, 5% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.3 kg/nm · median 86.1 (−11%)
63.6Ranks 1,089 of 3,548, lowest first124.7
Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.8 (−6%)
8.8Faster than 28% of bulk carrier ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (−30%)
4.85Ranks 660 of 3,548, lowest first17.36
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU93%
  • Into the EU6%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • DSI POLLUX
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • DSI POLLUX
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • DSI POLLUX
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2023−2.6 kn−13%−30%−72%+6%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published3261,0204,27442410.176.35.75–
2019not published1,3534,23915,4651,22112.787.55.40–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2023not published5.758.27−30%660 of 3,548Bureau VeritasA
2019not published5.408.38−36%467 of 3,360ABSB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

DSI POLLUX (IMO 9747405): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2023 | Navalyze