Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SWAN PACIFIC

IMO: 9749805
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 9,696 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SNOW PLOEG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: INVENTOR CHEMICAL TANKERS AS

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,838 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

64.8

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (−14%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,255 t

CO₂ emitted

7,064 t

Distance sailed

34,820 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,492 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−13%)

52.8Ranks 475 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 82% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+48%)

7.93Ranks 1,019 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU18%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

601 t

8.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SWAN PACIFIC
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SWAN PACIFIC
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SWAN PACIFIC
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+6%	+15%	−18%	+13%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.6 kn	+4%	−15%	+112%	+31%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−1%	+10%	+80%	+14%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−20%	−31%	−31%	−25%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	−0.3 kn	+44%	+40%	+171%	−52%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.5 kn	−15%	+23%	−73%	+152%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	INVENTOR CHEMICAL TANKERS AS	3,829	11,933	55,362	4,590	12.1	69.2	22.2	–
2024	INVENTOR CHEMICAL TANKERS AS	4,387	13,688	67,308	6,067	11.1	65.2	19.7	–
2023	not published	1,984	6,185	31,738	2,319	13.7	62.5	15.1	–
2022	not published	1,115	3,478	17,602	1,440	12.2	63.4	13.2	–
2021	not published	2,013	6,351	25,551	1,805	14.2	78.8	17.6	–
2019	not published	516	1,610	9,421	649	14.5	54.8	37.0	–
2018	not published	2,255	7,064	34,820	3,492	10.0	64.8	14.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	INVENTOR CHEMICAL TANKERS AS	22.2	15.0	+48%	1,019 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	INVENTOR CHEMICAL TANKERS AS	19.7	16.7	+18%	764 of 1,274	DNV	C
2023	not published	15.1	16.2	−7%	597 of 1,314	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	13.2	16.1	−18%	493 of 1,409	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	17.6	16.7	+5%	735 of 1,343	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	37.0	17.3	+113%	1,132 of 1,321	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	14.7	17.1	−14%	489 of 1,294	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.