Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI

IMO: 9757876
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 95,074 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.31 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 95,074 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

264.8 kg/nm

Container median 165.1 kg/nm (+60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.69

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.40 (−55%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,897 t

CO₂ emitted

15,282 t

Distance sailed

18,497 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,222 h

51 days, 14% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 264.8 kg/nm · median 165.1 (+60%)

77.6Ranks 1,593 of 1,899, lowest first290.9

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.2 (+14%)

10.0Faster than 87% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.40 (−55%)

7.34Ranks 302 of 1,899, lowest first51.88

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports37%
From the EU30%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2020→2023	−0.7 kn	+6%	+2%	−30%	+18%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−3%	−7%	−68%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−19%	−13%	+176%	−16%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023	not published	4,897	15,282	18,497	1,222	15.1	264.8	8.69	–
2020	not published	6,553	20,451	26,351	1,666	15.8	248.7	7.36	–
2019	not published	20,823	64,944	81,390	4,923	16.5	255.8	8.32	–
2018	not published	9,328	29,117	29,473	1,911	15.4	316.5	9.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	8.69	19.40	−55%	302 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	7.36	17.58	−58%	198 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	8.32	18.88	−56%	215 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.90	20.22	−51%	257 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.