Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

XING CHANG HAI

IMO: 9758492
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 32,704 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.49 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: SEARISE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 32,704 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

74.3 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.12

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (−12%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

649 t

CO₂ emitted

2,031 t

2,063 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,724 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

684 h

29 days, 8% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.3 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−12%)

61.8Ranks 939 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 10.6 (+21%)

8.8Faster than 98% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−12%)

4.85Ranks 1,134 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU54%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,028 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

XING CHANG HAI
Bulk carrier median

70.075.080.085.090.0

’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

XING CHANG HAI
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

XING CHANG HAI
Bulk carrier median

7.07.58.08.59.0

’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−13%	−8%	−3%	−21%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	SEARISE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	649	2,031	8,724	684	12.8	74.3	7.12	–
2023	not published	767	2,399	8,999	739	12.2	85.3	8.96	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	SEARISE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	7.12	8.09	−12%	1,134 of 3,089	DNV	A
2023	not published	8.96	8.27	+8%	2,040 of 3,548	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.