Navalyze · Container · Ship

TAMANRASSET

IMO: 9760615
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,526 t
Flag (estimated): Algeria
Port of registry: Algiers
Technical efficiency: EEDI 19.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CNAN MED Spa

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,115 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

101

Container median 182 kg/nm (−44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

51.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+156%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,371 t

CO₂ emitted

10,529 t

Distance sailed

33,250 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,584 h

108 days, 29% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 157 kg/nm · median 177 (−11%)

78.8Ranks 972 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 29% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 40.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+145%)

7.22Ranks 1,877 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU12%
Into the EU85%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

255 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TAMANRASSET
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TAMANRASSET
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TAMANRASSET
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+32%	+23%	−22%	−3%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+21%	+26%	−13%	−14%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	−16%	−8%	−42%	−2%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	−12%	−0%	−2%	−15%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+14%	+7%	−29%	−42%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+3%	+9%	+6%	+15%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.1 kn	+12%	−15%	−15%	+65%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CNAN MED Spa	1,287	4,111	8,211	692	11.9	157	40.0	–
2024	CNAN MED Spa	1,249	3,956	10,494	826	12.7	119	41.4	–
2023	not published	1,185	3,749	12,052	992	12.2	98.3	47.8	–
2022	not published	2,449	7,752	20,851	1,888	11.0	118	48.8	–
2021	not published	2,830	8,958	21,263	2,174	9.8	133	57.1	–
2020	not published	3,466	10,859	29,787	2,855	10.4	116	98.5	–
2019	not published	3,191	9,961	28,155	2,866	9.8	113	85.4	–
2018	not published	3,371	10,529	33,250	2,584	12.9	101	51.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CNAN MED Spa	40.0	16.3	+145%	1,877 of 2,208	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	CNAN MED Spa	41.4	17.5	+136%	1,636 of 1,974	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	47.8	19.4	+146%	1,650 of 1,899	Bureau Veritas	B
2022	not published	48.8	19.1	+155%	1,590 of 1,825	Bureau Veritas	B
2021	not published	57.1	17.9	+219%	1,656 of 1,781	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2020	not published	98.5	17.6	+461%	1,795 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2019	not published	85.4	18.9	+352%	1,758 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2018	not published	51.8	20.2	+156%	1,509 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.