Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

HYUNDAI PRINCEPIA

IMO: 9761841
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

176.8 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

5.77

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−37%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,166 t

CO₂ emitted

11,769 t

Distance sailed

23,563 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,431 h

60 days, 16% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 176.8 kg/nm · median 230.7 (−23%)

166.5Ranks 52 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 14.2 (+16%)

10.7Faster than 95% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.77 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−37%)

5.47Ranks 46 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HYUNDAI PRINCEPIA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’232023

Average speed, kn

HYUNDAI PRINCEPIA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

HYUNDAI PRINCEPIA
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2023	−0.3 kn	−8%	−10%	+91%	−11%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023LNG	not published	4,166	11,769	23,563	1,431	16.5	176.8	–	–
2019LNG	not published	2,379	6,811	12,320	735	16.8	193.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG	not published	5.77	9.10	−37%	46 of 355	Korean Register	C
2019LNG	not published	6.49	10.87	−40%	27 of 248	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.