Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BRITISH PARTNER

IMO: 9766530
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BP Shipping Ltd

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

243

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.7

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (+12%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

89.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,761 t

CO₂ emitted

34,351 t

Distance sailed

48,382 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,138 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 184 kg/nm · median 190 (−3%)

152Ranks 169 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 17.1 kn · median 14.4 (+19%)

11.2Faster than 98% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.82 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−4%)

5.06Ranks 179 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU34%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

4,058 t

35% of all fuel; 66% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

653 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BRITISH PARTNER
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

BRITISH PARTNER
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BRITISH PARTNER
LNG carrier median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	+0.2 kn	−17%	−16%	+193%	−96%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	−9%	+0%	−89%	+1,516%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−20%	−19%	+37%	+86%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−18%	−10%	−32%	−71%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+114%	+108%	+99%	+214%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 114%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BP Shipping Ltd	2,855	7,917	15,525	906	17.1	184	–	5%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	1,173	3,416	5,292	313	16.9	222	–	98%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11,761	34,351	48,382	3,138	15.4	243	–	35%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10,776	29,935	35,277	2,325	15.2	306	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	19,525	54,225	52,094	3,799	13.7	375	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	4,579	13,169	26,178	1,855	14.1	175	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BP Shipping Ltd	6.82	7.12	−4%	179 of 386	ABS	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	190	10.4	+1,728%	376 of 379	ABS	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	10.5	+12%	175 of 289	ABS	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6.32	10.7	−41%	17 of 267	ABS	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	22.0	10.9	+102%	222 of 248	ABS	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	7.00	10.9	−36%	32 of 197	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.