Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE TREASURE

IMO: 9773222
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 94,201 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL TREASURE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 125,822 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

307

Container median 174 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.60

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−60%)

Average speed

18.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+34%)

Fuel per day at sea

134.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,163 t

CO₂ emitted

50,394 t

Distance sailed

52,699 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,876 h

120 days, 33% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 253 kg/nm · median 177 (+43%)

78.8Ranks 1,678 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 13.3 (−16%)

9.1Faster than 24% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−49%)

7.22Ranks 393 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU48%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,560 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE TREASURE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE TREASURE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE TREASURE
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	−8%	−22%	+25%	–	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+19%	+18%	−18%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−16%	−22%	+26%	−6%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+0%	−8%	−23%	+7%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−2%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	−14%	−26%	−7%	−25%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	+5%	+29%	+20%	–	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	11,965	37,320	47,333	4,215	11.2	253	8.37	–
2024	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	10,421	32,572	37,909	2,862	13.2	275	–	–
2023	not published	10,746	33,938	46,454	3,483	13.3	231	5.95	–
2022	not published	10,080	31,887	36,785	2,539	14.5	274	6.32	–
2021	not published	13,069	41,286	47,894	3,014	15.9	273	5.90	–
2020	not published	12,981	40,504	49,075	3,113	15.8	265	5.73	–
2019	not published	16,163	50,394	52,699	2,876	18.3	307	7.60	–
2018	not published	12,789	39,989	43,929	2,933	15.0	291	0.07	96%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	8.37	16.3	−49%	393 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	5.95	19.4	−69%	53 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	6.32	19.1	−67%	60 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	5.90	17.9	−67%	46 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	5.73	17.6	−67%	32 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	7.60	18.9	−60%	163 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.