Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TRUE CONRAD

IMO: 9778430
Type: Bulk carrier
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: POLAR 20 LIMITED

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

136.7 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

13.3 kn

Fuel per day at sea

43.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

84 t

CO₂ emitted

262 t

266 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

613 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

46 h

2 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 170.8 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+102%)

61.8Ranks 3,046 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.6 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 62% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 3.99 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−51%)

4.85Ranks 142 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU100%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (131 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TRUE CONRAD
Bulk carrier median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRUE CONRAD
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.4 kn	−20%	−3%	−92%	–	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	POLAR 20 LIMITED	84	262	613	46	13.3	136.7	–	–
2024	POLAR 20 LIMITED	1,336	4,164	7,826	716	10.9	170.8	3.99	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	POLAR 20 LIMITED	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	POLAR 20 LIMITED	3.99	8.09	−51%	142 of 3,089	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.