Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TCLC LUZHOU

IMO
9780603
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
837 t
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency
EEDI 3.82 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 837 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
89.8 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
340
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
11.9 kn
Fuel per day at sea
25.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
631 t
CO₂ emitted
1,999 t
Distance sailed
7,021 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
589 h
25 days, 7% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 3,150 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 84.8 kg/nm · median 86.5 (−2%)
63.9Ranks 1,468 of 3,150, lowest first123.3
Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 11.1 (+4%)
9.3Faster than 69% of bulk carrier ships12.3
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.52 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.24 (−9%)
5.13Ranks 1,279 of 3,150, lowest first14.62
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports7%
  • From the EU71%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU22%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
21.7%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • TCLC LUZHOU
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • TCLC LUZHOU
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2022+0.8 kn+8%+15%+399%–0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.4 kn−2%−5%−86%–0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2022not published6311,9997,02158911.989.8340.22–
2021not published1173761,40612611.183.4––
2020not published8292,6179,77484811.584.87.52–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2022not published––––DNVA
2021not published––––DNVA
2020not published7.528.24−9%1,279 of 3,150DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

TCLC LUZHOU (IMO 9780603): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2020–2022 | Navalyze