Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GIFTED

IMO: 9786827
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 133,572 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.55 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Synergy Marine Pte Ltd · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 157,616 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

364

Container median 174 kg/nm (+109%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.21

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−62%)

Average speed

18.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+35%)

Fuel per day at sea

161.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

32,887 t

CO₂ emitted

102,636 t

Distance sailed

90,316 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,882 h

203 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 328 kg/nm · median 177 (+85%)

78.8Ranks 2,095 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.9 kn · median 13.3 (+27%)

9.1Faster than 97% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−53%)

7.22Ranks 291 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU28%
Into the EU68%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,453 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GIFTED
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GIFTED
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GIFTED
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−1%	−7%	−3%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	−0%	+15%	+11%	–	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−5%	−14%	+36%	+0%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−7%	−4%	−11%	+18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+1%	−5%	−16%	+11%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+2%	−2%	−20%	+4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	11,357	35,407	35,161	1,997	17.6	323	7.94	–
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	26,009	81,047	79,420	4,707	16.9	328	7.64	–
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	27,089	84,429	81,616	4,537	18.0	332	–	–
2023	not published	24,511	76,542	73,670	4,716	15.6	333	9.78	–
2022	not published	18,850	58,819	54,041	3,123	17.3	349	9.78	–
2021	not published	22,766	70,992	60,490	3,605	16.8	376	8.28	–
2020	not published	26,932	83,897	72,280	4,073	17.7	373	7.47	–
2019	not published	32,887	102,636	90,316	4,882	18.5	364	7.21	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	7.64	16.3	−53%	291 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	9.78	19.4	−50%	372 of 1,899	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	9.78	19.1	−49%	307 of 1,825	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	8.28	17.9	−54%	199 of 1,781	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	7.47	17.6	−58%	203 of 1,797	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	7.21	18.9	−62%	139 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.