Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GLOBE

IMO: 9786841
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 31,213 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Synergy Marine Pte Ltd · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,213 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

341.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+93%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.09

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+109%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

136.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

28,381 t

CO₂ emitted

88,488 t

89,881 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

83,161 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,992 h

208 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 341.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+93%)

78.8Ranks 2,133 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 13.3 (+26%)

9.1Faster than 96% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+109%)

7.22Ranks 1,771 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU37%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU1%

25% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,324 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

1.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EVER GLOBE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GLOBE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GLOBE
Container median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+2%	−2%	+10%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+15%	+19%	+5%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−18%	−19%	+57%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−3%	−7%	−16%	+1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+5%	+6%	−26%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+3%	−1%	+376%	+1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	15,043	46,898	45,476	2,816	16.1	330.8	21.79	–
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	28,381	88,488	83,161	4,992	16.7	341.3	34.09	–
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	25,258	78,743	75,503	4,353	17.3	334.5	–	–
2023	not published	20,917	65,256	72,051	4,286	16.8	290.3	7.21	–
2022	not published	16,295	50,824	46,011	2,721	16.9	354.2	7.29	–
2021	not published	19,901	62,071	54,761	3,107	17.6	363.4	7.20	–
2020	not published	25,617	79,804	74,352	4,230	17.6	344.5	6.87	–
2019	not published	5,221	16,298	15,625	856	18.2	334.1	6.78	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	34.09	16.30	+109%	1,771 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+C
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	7.21	19.40	−63%	177 of 1,899	ClassNK	A+B
2022	not published	7.29	19.13	−62%	164 of 1,825	ClassNK	A+B
2021	not published	7.20	17.90	−60%	155 of 1,781	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	6.87	17.58	−61%	158 of 1,797	ClassNK	A+B
2019	not published	6.78	18.88	−64%	100 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.