Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GLOBE

IMO: 9786841
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 31,213 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Synergy Marine Pte Ltd · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 156,234 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

345

Container median 172 kg/nm (+100%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.87

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−61%)

Average speed

17.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

145.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

25,617 t

CO₂ emitted

79,804 t

Distance sailed

74,352 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,230 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 341 kg/nm · median 177 (+93%)

78.8Ranks 2,133 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 13.3 (+26%)

9.1Faster than 96% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+109%)

7.22Ranks 1,771 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU48%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,610 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GLOBE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GLOBE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GLOBE
Container median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+2%	−2%	+10%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+15%	+19%	+5%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−18%	−19%	+57%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−3%	−7%	−16%	+1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+5%	+6%	−26%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+3%	−1%	+376%	+1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	15,043	46,898	45,476	2,816	16.1	331	21.8	–
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	28,381	88,488	83,161	4,992	16.7	341	34.1	–
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	25,258	78,743	75,503	4,353	17.3	335	–	–
2023	not published	20,917	65,256	72,051	4,286	16.8	290	7.21	–
2022	not published	16,295	50,824	46,011	2,721	16.9	354	7.29	–
2021	not published	19,901	62,071	54,761	3,107	17.6	363	7.20	–
2020	not published	25,617	79,804	74,352	4,230	17.6	345	6.87	–
2019	not published	5,221	16,298	15,625	856	18.2	334	6.78	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	34.1	16.3	+109%	1,771 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+C
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	7.21	19.4	−63%	177 of 1,899	ClassNK	A+B
2022	not published	7.29	19.1	−62%	164 of 1,825	ClassNK	A+B
2021	not published	7.20	17.9	−60%	155 of 1,781	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	6.87	17.6	−61%	158 of 1,797	ClassNK	A+B
2019	not published	6.78	18.9	−64%	100 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.