Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VICTORIA OF WIGHT

IMO: 9791028
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Portsmouth
Technical efficiency: EIV 57.44 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

48.6 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

0.10

g CO₂/pax·nm

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

0.10

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

9.4 kn

Fuel per day at sea

11.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,269 t

CO₂ emitted

7,274 t

Distance sailed

46,682 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,940 h

206 days, 56% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2018

Set against all 361 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 46.9 kg/nm · median 158.4 (−70%)

85.2Ranks 2 of 361, lowest first255.0

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 16.1 (−42%)

12.7Faster than 3% of ro-pax ships22.1

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 10.32 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 728.92 (−99%)

10.32Ranks 37 of 361, lowest first2,837.37

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 184.05 (−99%)

2.77Ranks 23 of 361, lowest first1,367.08

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports100%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VICTORIA OF WIGHT
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

VICTORIA OF WIGHT
Ro-pax median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−6%	−6%	+3%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+10%	+10%	+584%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	2,269	7,274	46,682	4,940	9.4	48.6	–	–
2019	not published	2,330	7,472	45,126	4,775	9.4	51.6	–	–
2018	not published	310	992	6,602	699	9.4	46.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	10.32	728.92	−99%	37 of 361	1.41	184.05	−99%	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.