Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BANGLAR AGRAGOTI

IMO: 9793870
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 17,717 t
Flag (estimated): Bangladesh
Port of registry: Chattogram
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bangladesh Shipping Corporation

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,240 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

99.7

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (−31%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,144 t

CO₂ emitted

6,792 t

Distance sailed

21,514 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,809 h

75 days, 21% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+6%)

52.8Ranks 853 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 69% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−1%)

7.93Ranks 721 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU34%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

582 t

8.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BANGLAR AGRAGOTI
Chemical tanker median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BANGLAR AGRAGOTI
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BANGLAR AGRAGOTI
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+25%	+33%	+261%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−27%	−34%	−82%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+3.4 kn	−43%	−21%	+26%	−83%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 43%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.3 kn	+97%	+44%	−55%	+632%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 97%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−18%	−16%	+98%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.9 kn	−15%	+45%	−1%	−13%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bangladesh Shipping Corporation	1,329	4,169	15,749	1,349	11.7	84.4	14.9	–
2024	Bangladesh Shipping Corporation	295	938	4,368	398	11.0	67.6	750	–
2023	not published	2,248	7,120	24,302	1,996	12.2	92.5	13.0	–
2022	not published	3,120	9,863	19,334	2,189	8.8	161	75.9	–
2021	not published	3,496	10,971	42,607	3,528	12.1	82.0	10.4	–
2020	not published	2,144	6,792	21,514	1,809	11.9	99.7	11.2	–
2019	not published	2,542	7,955	21,736	3,109	7.0	117	12.9	70%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bangladesh Shipping Corporation	14.9	15.0	−1%	721 of 1,460	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Bangladesh Shipping Corporation	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	13.0	16.2	−20%	431 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	75.9	16.1	+373%	1,391 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	10.4	16.7	−38%	204 of 1,343	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	11.2	16.2	−31%	258 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	12.9	17.3	−26%	376 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.