Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

TORM FREEDOM

IMO: 9797395
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 36,946 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Vejle
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.38 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: STENA IMPRIMIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Bulk XIV Cyprus Limited · part of Stena

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,026 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

86.7

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (−37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.75

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−12%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,730 t

CO₂ emitted

5,415 t

Distance sailed

19,949 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,769 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 107 kg/nm · median 129 (−17%)

76.1Ranks 485 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 10.7 (+8%)

8.0Faster than 77% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+15%)

4.51Ranks 981 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU24%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

257 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TORM FREEDOM
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TORM FREEDOM
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TORM FREEDOM
Chemical tanker median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+19%	+23%	−33%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	+2.4 kn	−11%	+13%	+2%	+14%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.9 kn	+19%	−18%	+420%	+18%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+20%	+51%	−39%	−7%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	−18%	−26%	−57%	+6%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.9 kn	+9%	+46%	+23%	+10%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Stena Bulk XIV Cyprus Limited	2,002	6,291	18,689	1,614	11.6	107	9.11	–
2025	TORM A/S	2,002	6,291	18,689	1,614	11.6	107	9.11	–
2024	Stena Bulk XIV Cyprus Limited	2,492	7,834	27,746	2,462	11.3	89.8	10.3	–
2022	not published	2,754	8,643	27,239	3,074	8.9	101	9.06	–
2021	not published	445	1,389	5,235	408	12.8	85.0	7.70	–
2020	not published	610	1,904	8,584	841	10.2	71.0	8.24	–
2019	not published	1,730	5,415	19,949	1,769	11.3	86.7	7.75	–
2018	not published	1,299	4,070	16,277	1,939	8.4	79.8	7.05	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Stena Bulk XIV Cyprus Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	TORM A/S	9.11	7.95	+15%	981 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	Stena Bulk XIV Cyprus Limited	10.3	16.7	−38%	268 of 1,274	DNV	B
2022	not published	9.06	16.1	−44%	144 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	7.70	16.7	−54%	48 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	8.24	16.2	−49%	73 of 1,312	DNV	B
2019	not published	7.75	8.83	−12%	766 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	7.05	8.86	−20%	591 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.