Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NORDIC ACE

IMO: 9800104
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,007 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: OTAMAY SHIPPING INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,007 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

52.4 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+56%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

467 t

CO₂ emitted

1,463 t

1,486 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,915 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

764 h

32 days, 9% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 52.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−34%)

52.8Ranks 139 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 70% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+56%)

7.93Ranks 1,048 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU38%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (813 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NORDIC ACE
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC ACE
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC ACE
Chemical tanker median

12.515.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	−0.7 kn	−21%	−25%	−14%	+27%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+10%	+9%	−30%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+16%	+29%	−55%	+4%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−13%	−21%	+208%	+27%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−4%	−2%	−55%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−17%	−6%	+93%	−3%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	OTAMAY SHIPPING INC.	467	1,463	8,915	764	11.7	52.4	23.42	–
2023	not published	683	2,164	10,320	833	12.4	66.1	18.45	–
2022	not published	883	2,788	14,663	1,179	12.4	60.2	18.60	–
2021	not published	1,686	5,333	32,571	2,905	11.2	51.8	17.82	–
2020	not published	631	1,984	10,561	867	12.2	59.8	14.01	–
2019	not published	1,462	4,608	23,342	1,956	11.9	62.6	19.05	–
2018	not published	911	2,848	12,116	1,153	10.5	75.2	19.63	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	OTAMAY SHIPPING INC.	23.42	15.04	+56%	1,048 of 1,460	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	18.45	16.23	+14%	736 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	18.60	16.06	+16%	819 of 1,409	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	17.82	16.69	+7%	745 of 1,343	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	14.01	16.16	−13%	488 of 1,312	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	19.05	17.32	+10%	760 of 1,321	DNV	A+C
2018	not published	19.63	17.14	+15%	780 of 1,294	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.