Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

CY INTEROCEAN I

IMO
9802970
Type
Other ship types
Average cargo carried
3,599 t
Flag (estimated)
South Korea
Port of registry
Jeju

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CHUNG YANG SHIPPING CO. LTD

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,203 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
90.5
Other median 85.8 kg/nm (+5%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
237
g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 159 (+49%)
Average speed
10.6 kn
Other median 11.2 kn (−5%)
Fuel per day at sea
23.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,817 t
CO₂ emitted
5,733 t
Distance sailed
20,089 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,886 h
79 days, 22% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.3 kg/nm · median 87.2 (+13%)
47.6Ranks 87 of 159, lowest first161
Average speedThis ship 7.4 kn · median 10.4 (−29%)
5.8Faster than 13% of other ships13.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 86.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.7 (+0%)
30.8Ranks 81 of 159, lowest first600
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU57%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
32 t
0.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CY INTEROCEAN I
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • CY INTEROCEAN I
  • Other median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CY INTEROCEAN I
  • Other median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+4.6 kn−26%+98%+324%−88%4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−5.8 kn+33%−57%−43%+380%5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023−2.0 kn+10%−11%−36%−35%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.5 kn−20%−6%−9%+159%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+2.3 kn+8%+45%−53%−48%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.1 kn−10%−23%+42%−29%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025CHUNG YANG SHIPPING CO. LTD3,0859,81731,3884,2157.498.386.9–
2024CHUNG YANG SHIPPING CO. LTD9783,1037,3992,6292.8132736–
2023not published1,2874,06312,9111,5108.699.7153–
2021not published1,8175,73320,0891,88610.690.5237–
2020not published2,4747,81121,9892,4209.111391.7–
2019not published4,92915,41347,2386,9856.8104177–
2018not published3,85512,03033,2284,2027.9116248–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2025CHUNG YANG SHIPPING CO. LTD86.986.7+0%81 of 159Korean RegisterA
2024CHUNG YANG SHIPPING CO. LTD73651.6+1,328%185 of 189Korean RegisterA
2023not published15393.5+64%78 of 116Korean RegisterA
2021not published237159+49%49 of 72Korean RegisterA
2020not published91.7121−24%36 of 81Korean RegisterA
2019not published17790.1+96%63 of 96Korean RegisterA
2018not published24872.9+241%61 of 87Korean RegisterA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.