Navalyze · Container · Ship

BG JADE

IMO: 9803687
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,755 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEDI 18.25 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,755 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

89.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.18

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+122%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,759 t

CO₂ emitted

11,776 t

11,960 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,969 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,161 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 89.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 393 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 49% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+122%)

7.22Ranks 1,808 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU23%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU19%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,778 t).

Fuel burned laden

76%

24% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

19.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BG JADE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BG JADE
Container median

13.013.514.014.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BG JADE
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+4%	−0%	−13%	+5%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+1%	+8%	+52%	+0%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+1%	−5%	−30%	+5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−9%	−10%	+3%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−11%	+3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+2%	+5%	−2%	+7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+3%	−2%	+16%	−6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	864	2,707	9,845	733	13.4	87.7	38.42	–
2025	Twenty-second New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co KG	3,759	11,776	41,969	3,161	13.3	89.6	36.18	76%
2024	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	4,141	12,961	48,154	3,471	13.9	86.0	34.39	–
2023	not published	2,691	8,426	31,748	2,445	13.0	84.8	34.28	–
2022	not published	3,787	11,843	45,295	3,271	13.8	83.6	32.54	–
2021	not published	4,003	12,541	43,794	3,122	14.0	91.4	37.25	–
2020	not published	4,429	13,863	49,353	3,594	13.7	89.7	36.15	–
2019	not published	4,451	13,931	50,488	3,798	13.3	88.2	33.91	–
2018	not published	3,720	11,652	43,377	3,107	14.0	85.8	36.13	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2025	Twenty-second New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co KG	36.18	16.30	+122%	1,808 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	34.39	17.52	+96%	1,538 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	34.28	19.40	+77%	1,438 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	32.54	19.13	+70%	1,351 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	37.25	17.90	+108%	1,443 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	36.15	17.58	+106%	1,423 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	33.91	18.88	+80%	1,328 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	36.13	20.22	+79%	1,274 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.