Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

YURIY KUCHIEV

IMO: 9804033
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,413 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EIV 15.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,180 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

157

Oil tanker median 131 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

35.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.51 (+311%)

Average speed

8.1 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (−26%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,343 t

CO₂ emitted

23,211 t

Distance sailed

46,808 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,761 h

240 days, 66% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 146 kg/nm · median 129 (+13%)

76.1Ranks 1,106 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.7 (+0%)

8.0Faster than 48% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+182%)

4.51Ranks 1,435 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU31%
Into the EU67%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

418 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YURIY KUCHIEV
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YURIY KUCHIEV
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YURIY KUCHIEV
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−7%	−1%	+14%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+25%	+37%	+5%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−20%	−10%	+42%	−44%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−10%	+0%	−2%	+44%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+12%	+7%	+32%	+1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−3.8 kn	+3%	−32%	+285%	+13%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	11,523	36,173	79,182	7,418	10.7	146	22.4	–
2024	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	10,960	34,522	69,754	6,985	10.0	157	0.34	–
2023	not published	8,396	26,391	66,596	7,302	9.1	126	19.5	–
2022	not published	7,343	23,211	46,808	5,761	8.1	157	35.0	–
2021	not published	8,302	26,267	47,712	6,524	7.3	174	24.2	–
2020	not published	5,580	17,732	36,042	4,710	7.7	155	24.0	–
2019	not published	1,411	4,440	9,371	817	11.5	151	21.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	22.4	7.95	+182%	1,435 of 1,665	EMICERT	A
2024	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	19.5	8.44	+131%	1,531 of 1,797	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	35.0	8.51	+311%	1,857 of 1,961	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	24.2	8.86	+173%	1,590 of 1,789	EMICERT	A
2020	not published	24.0	9.03	+166%	1,651 of 1,870	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	21.2	8.83	+140%	1,660 of 1,919	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.