Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS ANDROS

IMO: 9810379
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. · part of Maran

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

181

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.12

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−33%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,788 t

CO₂ emitted

35,887 t

Distance sailed

70,673 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,673 h

236 days, 65% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 161 kg/nm · median 190 (−16%)

152Ranks 70 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

11.2Faster than 58% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.30 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−26%)

5.06Ranks 64 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU50%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

571 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARAN GAS ANDROS
LNG carrier median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

MARAN GAS ANDROS
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.0

’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MARAN GAS ANDROS
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+2.2 kn	−11%	+5%	−83%	−13%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	+5%	−9%	+159%	−18%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+158%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	1,876	5,198	11,689	793	14.7	161	–	97%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12,788	35,887	70,673	5,673	12.5	181	–	–
2022	not published	4,719	13,978	27,310	1,897	14.4	173	–	–
2021	not published	1,899	5,744	10,590	735	14.4	179	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	5.30	7.12	−26%	64 of 386	ABS	A
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.12	9.10	−33%	65 of 355	ABS	A
2022	not published	7.44	10.4	−28%	111 of 379	ABS	A+C
2021	not published	6.77	10.5	−35%	57 of 289	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.