Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GOODS

IMO: 9810991
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 132,765 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.53 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 133,674 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

357

Container median 182 kg/nm (+96%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.35

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−59%)

Average speed

17.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+30%)

Fuel per day at sea

153.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,932 t

CO₂ emitted

52,909 t

Distance sailed

47,402 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,654 h

111 days, 30% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 312 kg/nm · median 177 (+76%)

78.8Ranks 2,029 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 58% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−55%)

7.22Ranks 236 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU24%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,386 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GOODS
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GOODS
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GOODS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.3 kn	−5%	−19%	−2%	−3%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.1 kn	+2%	−10%	+105%	−9%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.7 kn	−10%	+6%	−21%	+14%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.9 kn	−3%	−22%	−23%	−13%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+16%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−7%	−11%	−9%	−8%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.3 kn	+9%	+23%	+24%	−5%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	23,871	74,427	76,583	5,533	13.8	312	7.32	–
2024	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	25,746	80,247	78,066	4,843	16.1	330	7.56	–
2023	not published	12,350	38,495	38,065	2,097	18.2	324	8.32	–
2022	not published	17,281	53,865	48,061	3,101	15.5	360	7.27	–
2021	not published	23,128	72,904	62,425	3,224	19.4	371	8.40	–
2020	not published	19,446	60,626	53,585	2,768	19.4	363	7.33	–
2019	not published	22,815	71,285	58,660	2,903	20.2	389	7.96	–
2018	not published	16,932	52,909	47,402	2,654	17.9	357	8.35	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	7.32	16.3	−55%	236 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	7.56	17.5	−57%	225 of 1,974	ClassNK	A+B+C
2023	not published	8.32	19.4	−57%	266 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	7.27	19.1	−62%	161 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	8.40	17.9	−53%	203 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	7.33	17.6	−58%	192 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	7.96	18.9	−58%	186 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	8.35	20.2	−59%	162 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.