Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GIVEN

IMO: 9811000
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 139,478 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: LUSTER MARITIME/HIGAKI SANGYO

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 158,670 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

339

Container median 172 kg/nm (+97%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.67

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−62%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+22%)

Fuel per day at sea

139.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,293 t

CO₂ emitted

63,269 t

Distance sailed

59,782 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,490 h

145 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 343 kg/nm · median 177 (+94%)

78.8Ranks 2,135 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 89% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.66 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−53%)

7.22Ranks 294 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU35%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,259 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GIVEN
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GIVEN
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GIVEN
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−2%	−6%	+4%	−3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+7%	+18%	+29%	+10%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−1%	+4%	+32%	−2%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+5.5 kn	−24%	+23%	+331%	−49%	5.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−8.1 kn	+28%	−33%	−82%	+116%	8.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−1%	+6%	−27%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	LUSTER MARITIME/HIGAKI SANGYO	28,678	89,226	83,513	5,228	16.0	343	7.66	–
2024	LUSTER MARITIME/HIGAKI SANGYO	28,272	88,119	80,545	4,818	16.7	351	7.90	–
2023	not published	20,423	63,715	62,543	4,107	15.2	327	7.19	–
2022	not published	15,696	49,004	47,487	3,272	14.5	331	7.30	–
2021	not published	4,804	15,140	11,024	1,230	9.0	436	14.4	–
2020	not published	20,293	63,269	59,782	3,490	17.1	339	6.67	–
2019	not published	28,152	87,925	82,262	5,119	16.1	342	6.97	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	LUSTER MARITIME/HIGAKI SANGYO	7.66	16.3	−53%	294 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	LUSTER MARITIME/HIGAKI SANGYO	7.90	17.5	−55%	255 of 1,974	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	7.19	19.4	−63%	175 of 1,899	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	7.30	19.1	−62%	166 of 1,825	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	14.4	17.9	−19%	673 of 1,781	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	6.67	17.6	−62%	144 of 1,797	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	6.97	18.9	−63%	114 of 1,788	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.