Navalyze · Other · Ship

MAPLE

IMO: 9811543
Type: Other ship types
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: FIBER MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT & TRADING CO.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

71.3 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.9 kn

Fuel per day at sea

20.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

790 t

CO₂ emitted

2,463 t

2,502 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,083 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

934 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2021

Set against all 72 other ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 118.2 kg/nm · median 85.8 (+38%)

48.5Ranks 60 of 72, lowest first129.1

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.2 (−3%)

8.6Faster than 44% of other ships14.2

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.71 g CO₂/t·nm · median 159.48 (−93%)

12.47Ranks 5 of 72, lowest first538.05

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU0%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,262 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAPLE
Other median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’192019’212021’242024

Average speed, kn

MAPLE
Other median

10.011.012.013.0

’192019’212021’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAPLE
Other median

0.050.0100150200

’192019’212021

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2021→2024	+1.0 kn	−40%	−34%	+791%	–	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 40%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2021	−1.5 kn	+61%	+41%	−84%	+20%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 61%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	FIBER MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT & TRADING CO.	790	2,463	11,083	934	11.9	71.3	–	–
2021	not published	147	464	1,244	114	10.9	118.2	11.71	–
2019	not published	563	1,757	7,678	617	12.4	73.4	9.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	FIBER MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT & TRADING CO.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	11.71	159.48	−93%	5 of 72	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	9.76	90.12	−89%	3 of 96	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.