Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

POPI SAZAKLIS

IMO: 9817494
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 141,674 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.78 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MORVIKEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SOHO SHIPPING &TRADING CO

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,438 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

115

Oil tanker median 140 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (−40%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Oil tanker median 9.8 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,753 t

CO₂ emitted

18,013 t

Distance sailed

49,848 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,550 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 146 kg/nm · median 129 (+14%)

76.1Ranks 1,114 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 10.7 (+16%)

8.0Faster than 95% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 3.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−59%)

4.51Ranks 35 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU36%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

3,222 t

56% of all fuel; 44% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,389 t

7.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

POPI SAZAKLIS
Oil tanker median

110.0120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

POPI SAZAKLIS
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

POPI SAZAKLIS
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+15%	+22%	−89%	−50%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−11%	−7%	+45%	+8%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	−5%	+5%	+128%	−4%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.0 kn	+7%	+34%	−15%	+72%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.0 kn	+8%	−21%	−39%	−31%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−0%	+2%	−49%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+13%	+13%	−9%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SOHO SHIPPING &TRADING CO	641	1,997	4,378	352	12.4	146	3.22	–
2024	SOHO SHIPPING &TRADING CO	4,991	15,675	39,144	3,349	11.7	128	6.49	52%
2023	not published	3,866	12,116	27,050	2,404	11.3	143	6.03	75%
2022	not published	1,791	5,606	11,844	1,169	10.1	151	6.27	–
2021	not published	1,969	6,198	13,997	1,723	8.1	141	3.65	–
2020	not published	2,995	9,400	23,003	2,067	11.1	130	5.30	–
2019	not published	5,911	18,500	45,332	4,163	10.9	130	5.04	–
2018	not published	5,753	18,013	49,848	4,550	11.0	115	5.28	56%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SOHO SHIPPING &TRADING CO	3.22	7.95	−59%	35 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	SOHO SHIPPING &TRADING CO	6.49	8.06	−19%	568 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	6.03	8.44	−29%	433 of 1,797	ABS	–
2022	not published	6.27	8.51	−26%	518 of 1,961	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	3.65	8.86	−59%	59 of 1,789	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	5.30	9.03	−41%	251 of 1,870	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	5.04	8.83	−43%	257 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	5.28	8.86	−40%	324 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.